Quick Search Form

Book Title: Treating and Preventing Adolescent Mental Health Disorders  > pp. [445]-[449]
Click here to open a preview window containing the current page in a printer-friendly form Printer Friendly   go to page    previous  |  next

 
CHAPTER 22 Universal Approaches to Youth Suicide Prevention
end p.445
In this chapter, we focus on suicide prevention programs that have taken a universal approach, targeting youth in specific settings regardless of individual risk factors. One particularly widespread approach targets youth where they are most accessible—in the schools. Although the ultimate goal of all suicide prevention programs is to reduce death by suicide, school-based programs typically focus on more proximal outcomes.
Two broad types of universal prevention programs have been especially common. The first includes educational programs that aim to increase students' knowledge and awareness about suicidal behavior, encourage troubled students to seek help, and improve recognition of at-risk students by teachers, counselors, and other “gatekeepers” within the school or community settings. In the second category are screen-ing programs that seek to identify and refer to treatment youth who are at risk for suicidal behavior.
In each category, suicide prevention efforts have been separately designed for high school and college students. In the following pages, we summarize these universal programs, identifying for each broad type the underlying assumptions and specific program examples, and providing a summary critique of the approach.
SUICIDE AWARENESS AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Assumptions
A wide range of suicide education and awareness programs have been developed; these are summarized in Table 22.1 The key assumptions underlying such programs are that the conditions that contribute to suicide risk in adolescents and young adults often go unrecognized, undiagnosed, and untreated, and that educating students and gatekeepers about the warning signs for suicide and appropriate responses will result in better identification of at-risk youth, and an increase in help seeking and referrals for treatment.
Program Examples
Most suicide awareness and education programs described in the literature have been implemented at the high school level and share a core of common programmatic features, centering on a suicide education curriculum, supplemented in some cases with training directed toward teachers and other gatekeepers. Such programs are exemplified by those developed by Kalafat and colleagues (Kalafat & Elias, 1992, 1994; Kalafat & Gagliano, 1996; Kalafat & Ryerson, 1999), which incorporate education about the warning signs of suicide and appropriate help-seeking behaviors into the regular physical education or related curricula. Such education has been reported by the program developers to result in students' increased knowledge about suicidal behavior, more positive attitudes about talking to friends they believe to be suicidal, and seeking of help from adults. In its most fully developed form, the Adolescent Suicide Awareness Program (ASAP) includes education for teachers, school staff, and parents, as well as students. Although no controlled evaluations have been reported, the developers cited anecdotal reports of increased referrals of at-risk youth, following implementation of ASAP in a number of schools (Kalafat & Ryerson, 1999).
Another widely applied curriculum-based prevention effort is the Signs of Suicide (SOS) program, developed by Jacobs and colleagues. The SOS program delivers the core message that suicidal behavior is directly related to mental illness, particularly depression, and needs to be responded to as a mental health emergency. The instructional component, which occurs over one to two class periods, may be augmented with screening and parent-awareness activities. Schools in which the program has been implemented have reported substantial increases in students' help-seeking behavior and high satisfaction with the program among school officials (Aseltine, Jacobs, Kopans, & Bloom, 2003). In a recent posttest-only evaluation involving five high schools in Columbus, Georgia, and Hartford, Connecticut, 2,100 students were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. In self-administered questionnaires 3
end p.446
Table 22.1 Suicide Education Programs
Reference
Intervention
Study Design
Program Length
Sample Size
Comments
Spirito et al., 1988
Samaritan-based program
Nonrandom pre–postcontrol group design
8 hr
Experimental: 291 high school students
Control: 182 high school students
Program-exposed group demonstrated increase in knowledge
Females increased knowledge more than males
Overholser et al., 1989
Samaritan-based program with didactics, handouts, discussion, and role-playing
Nonrandom pre–postcontrol group design
5 health classes
Experimental: 215 ninth-grade students from two schools
Control: 256 ninth-grade students from one school
53% male from suburban middle class
Gender and personal experience related to students' knowledge and attitudes at baseline and after the program
More positive effect of program for females and slightly negative in some aspects for males
Students who knew suicidal peer were more likely to increase knowledge
All students except males with personal experience with suicidal behavior had decreased negative attitudes
No comparisons with controls presented
Shaffer et al., 1990
Didactics and discussion led by trained, regular education classroom teachers
Nonequivalent control group with 2×2 (attempt yes/no×program yes/no) pre–post design
1–3 hr, depending on school
Initial sample: N = 1,551 ninth graders
Final sample:
N = 63 suicide attempters (35 program/28 control)
N = 910 nonattempters (489 program/421 Control)
Majority felt others should participate in program
Changes in knowledge and attitudes tended to be in intended direction
Male attempters more likely than nonattempters to feel uncomfortable dealing with friends' problems, to know someone upset by program, and to discourage participation
Shaffer et al., 1991
Vieland et al., 1991
Didactic instruction and discussion
Pretest–posttest design with comparison group
Follow-ups at 1 month and of a subsample at 18 months
3 different suicide-awareness programs, each lasting 3–4 hr, focusing on symptom identification and help seeking; differences between programs in use of teachers and focus on help seeking, problem solving, or mobilizing networks
11 schools
n = 758 from 6 program schools (2 for each program)
n = 680 from 5 control schools
9th and 10th graders
5 urban
2 suburban
4 rural/suburban
Reaction to program was good
Females and nonwhite ethnic groups rated programs more highly
Base knowledge high; exposure increased controversial beliefs supported by the programs
Programs increased knowledge about where to get help but did not improve help-seeking behavior
Kalafat & Elias, 1994
Adolescent Suicide Awareness Program (ASAP)
Didactics and discussion program
Solomon four-group design
3 health class periods
253 suburban 10th graders
Increased knowledge about warning signs
Improved attitudes about help seeking
More likely to talk about a friend's suicidal behavior and refer for help
Kalafat & Gagliano, 1996
ASAP
Didactics, discussion, and simulated encounters with suicidal peers
Stratified random sample
Pre–post control group
5 health class periods
109 eighth graders (whole grade)
White
n = 52 experimental
n = 57 controls
Experimental group was more likely to tell an adult about suicidal peers
Less likely to report suicidal behavior to an adult when ambiguous
Zenere & Lazarus, 1997
Didactics and discussion
Epidemiological comparison
No control group
One class in 5-year program
Reports from department of crisis management
Decreased rate of suicide completions and suicide attempts
No change in suicidal ideation
Aseltine et al., 2003
Signs of Suicide (SOS)
Video, didactics, discussion, school kit with materials for screening and parents
One group posttest only, 1-and 3-month follow-up
1–2 class periods
376 high schools postscreen
233/376 schools at 1 month
64% white
12% African American
10% Latino
27% urban
33% suburban
41% rural
21% school lunch eligible
177/376 schools at 3 months
63% completed program and evaluation
Schools reported increased help-seeking behavior of students, increased help-seeking on behalf of friend, low cost
1% of teachers thought program might have had adverse effect
Thompson, 2003a
YSPP
Needs assessment and school-based student-led campaign program
Single group(s) qualitative design
Ongoing program
Gatekeepers, crisis teams, community groups, and high school students willing to participate
Increased awareness, knowledge, and number of students advising peers to get help
Direct involvement of students in antisuicide campaign development
National Mental Health Association
Booklets and offers of help to develop mental health programs
Not yet evaluated
Booklet
Distributed to college students, administrators, and student leaders, and on Web site
Not yet evaluated
Aseltine & DeMartine, 2004
SOS
Video and discussion guide
Columbia Depression Screen (CDS)
Posttest only
Stratified random assignment with delayed-treatment comparison group
2 health or social studies classes
N = 2,100
n = 1,435
3 classes from Hartford, CT High School
grades 9–12, “economically disadvantaged”
47% male
59% Hispanic
20% non-Hispanic black
20% in remedial English or ESL
n = 665 from two Columbus, GA high schools
ninth graders
52% male “working class”
39% white
37% African American
15% remedial English or ESL
SOS vs. Comparison
3.6 vs. 5.4 suicide attempts
SOS had higher posttest knowledge and more positive attitudes than comparison
No difference in suicidal ideation or treatment seeking
Combined schools without comparing
Don't know about pretest differences
ESL, English as a second language.
end p.447
end p.448
end p.449
  go to page    previous  |  next

 
doi:10.1093/9780195173642.003.0023
-->
Contents
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast

Return to Top